QUESTIONS OF THE WEEK
Question: What is the Succession Act?
The Succession Act 2006 was enacted to become the comprehensive legislative scheme which covers all matters concerning the estates of deceased persons and related matters. This fitted in with significant changes undertaken throughout the Commonwealth as part of a national movement to revise, update and harmonise State laws.
The Succession Act is designed to “restate, with reforms, the law relating to Wills in New South Wales: to ensure that adequate provision is made for the members of the family of a deceased person, and certain other persons, from the estate of the deceased person: to make provision for the distribution of intestate estates: and for other purposes.” It is indeed a comprehensive scheme.
The legislation addresses issues concerning the making, alteration, revocation and revival of Wills. It provides for the rectification of Wills where required. It deals with international Wills. It covers all matters pertaining to any family provision application and also sets out in detail the processes and the procedures involved in any litigation under the Act.
The legislation also sets out in detail the various factors that a court will take into account when dealing with any application brought under the legislation. In some circumstances the factors that the court must take into account can be specific and exhaustive. It can be a complicated and complex area of law but does not need to be.
If you have any issue or concern with any matter that may touch upon the Succession Act or concern a dispute with respect to benefits under a Will, then the experts at Brydens Lawyers can assist. To make a Will or for a free no obligation assessment as to whether you may have any entitlements to challenge a Will for benefits that would otherwise you would be entitled to, contact Brydens Lawyers without delay. If it is Strict time limits can apply.
Our past Questions
Question: What is the Succession Act? The Succession Act 2006 was enacted to become the comprehensive legislative scheme which covers all matters concerning the estates of deceased persons and related matters. This fitted in with significant changes undertaken...
Question of the week- FRIDAY 17TH JANUARY – I am being discriminated against in my workplace, do I have any legal remedies?
Question: I am being discriminated against in my workplace, do I have any legal remedies? Discrimination is unlawful under both Federal and State Law. Employers can be held legally responsible for any discrimination as against their employees if it occurs in the...
Question of the week- FRIDAY 10TH JANUARY – My spouse and I have decided to separate – at what stage should I consult a lawyer?
Question: My spouse and I have decided to separate - at what stage should I consult a lawyer? There is no strict rule as to when a lawyer needs to be consulted following the breakdown of a de facto relationship or marriage. Much will depend on the particular...
Question of the week- THURSDAY 20TH DECEMBER – My medical condition has worsened due to my doctor failing to give me a referral- am I eligible to make a claim?
Question: My medical condition has worsened due to my doctor failing to give me a referral- am I eligible to make a claim? There is imposed upon a doctor and all healthcare professionals an obligation to ensure that they conduct themselves with all due care and skill...
Question of the week- FRIDAY 13TH DECEMBER – What Are the New Legalities Surrounding off the Plan Sales?
Question: I Have Suffered a Loss of Hearing Due to My Line of Work - Am I Eligible to Make a Claim? In order to make a claim for hearing loss a worker needs to establish that the loss arose from the worker’s "noisy employment". That is, loss of hearing is not enough...
Question of the week- FRIDAY 06TH DECEMBER – What Are the New Legalities Surrounding off the Plan Sales?
Question: What Are the New Legalities Surrounding off the Plan Sales? Amendments have been made to the legislation and regulations which govern conveyancing in New South Wales effective 1 December 2019 which concern off the plan sales. These new laws have placed...
NEED LEGAL ADVICE? YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED
- PERSONAL INJURY
- FAMILY LAW
- SUPERANNUATION & TPD
- COMMERCIAL LAW
- PROPERTY LAW
- WORKERS COMPENSATION
- EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES
- ASK YOUR QUESTION HERE
I was involved in a car accident where someone changed lanes and hit me. I was in the left lane and deemed not at fault. I have no insurance but the other at fault driver does. I contacted his insurance company and they said he needs to lodge the insurance claim himself. I contacted him and he refused to lodge a claim. What do I do in this case to ensure damage to my vehicle is compensated for by the at fault party?
BRYDENS LAWYERS ANSWER:
What you have raised is unfortunately a difficulty that is encountered quite regularly. That is, if the party at fault does not make a claim on their insurance then the claims process itself is not activated and the insurer will not respond to a claim as against its insured. It is of course open to you to try and encourage the other party to make a claim on their insurer. If they fail or refuse to do so then there would be no reason why you should not commence formal court proceedings to recover the damages to which you are entitled. Such proceedings would no doubt focus the attention of the other party who would be motivated to contact their insurer. Brydens Lawyers are available to assist and should you require legal representation please click here to contact us to speak with one of our experts.
My partner and I have separated and we wish to resolve our financial issues. We purchased a house and land package together although our relationship broke down soon after. We have separated now and the house is near completion. Do we need to go to court? I want to make sure I receive what I am entitled to, I am worried it is getting messy and unfair.
BRYDENS LAWYERS ANSWER:
The majority of property settlements occur outside the court system. It is indeed the preferable course. It is a much cheaper and quicker alternative to commencing proceedings in court. If the parties are able to resolve their differences and reach a resolution then the agreement can be formalised and lodged with the Family Court for appropriate orders to be made. No court attendance is required. An alternative is for the parties to enter into a binding financial agreement which does not need to be lodged with the court. There are however a number of specific legal requirements pertaining to a binding financial agreement which must be fully complied with in order to ensure that the agreement is valid.
SUPERANNUATION & TPD
I used to work for a government agency from 1986 until November 1994. Due to a car accident on the way to work, I was injured and unable to work after this. I have been living on a disability pension ever since. Recently I have found out that I might be able to seek a lump sum payout and a pension from superannuation fund. Is this possible and can you assist with it?
BRYDENS LAWYERS ANSWER:
We assume that the insurer deemed you to be at fault in the accident and that no motor vehicle accident claim was made. It is correct that there may be rights available to you to claim lump sum benefits pursuant to your superannuation policy which would ordinarily contain provision for a total and permanent disablement claim. Given that you have been unable to work you would, ordinarily, qualify for payment of benefits in this regard. Brydens Lawyers has a specialised Superannuation and TPD Division which can assist. We would invite you to contact us to arrange an appointment with one of our expert lawyers.
I want to understand my current obligations under my commercial lease agreement that is contingent on DA being approved. My DA is not yet approved but I have been told the council today that they are thinking of providing me with a deferred commencement date which means the DA is not operational until the conditions are met. The financial implications are too much for me to meet the condition and I would prefer not to continue with the both the DA and the lease but don’t want to lose my deposit. What are my rights?
BRYDENS LAWYERS ANSWER:
Of course, any arrangements or contract including the Commercial Lease to which you refer, can be altered, amended or terminated by agreement between the parties. It would be recommended that discussions be undertaken with the lessor to determine whether or not they would be agreeable to a Surrender of Lease and if so, on what terms. Otherwise it will be the terms of the Commercial Lease that will determine the rights and obligations of the parties. If, as you say, the Commercial Lease is contingent on a DA being approved then until such time as the DA is approved the Commercial Lease is not in force or has effect. Brydens Lawyers has a specialised commercial division which is available to assist. We would invite you to contact Brydens Lawyers to speak with one of our experts should you wish to engage expert legal advice and representation.
We bought an investment property in QLD through a financial group in Sydney. They misrepresented the property, providing us with paperwork that states it was a brand new build. Upon settlement we found out that the property was in fact 5 years old. We want to claim compensation for loss of depreciation, extra strata costs, misrepresentation and mental anguish. Are we within our rights to do this?
BRYDENS LAWYERS ANSWER:
When buying any property the guiding principle for purchases is “buyer beware”. That is, as the purchaser you bear the onus of investigating and establishing exactly what it is that is being bought before Contracts are exchanged.
That being the case consideration may have to be given as to whether there is an available cause of action as against your solicitor or licensed conveyancer who acted on your behalf in whom was entrusted the obligation to ensure that what was being purchased was that which was being represented to you. Your legal representatives have an obligation to ensure that the contract and all the details of the property that are being purchased are explained to you fully and that you understand same.
Before advising further it would be necessary for us to undertake a complete review of your conveyancing file. The Contract and Disclosure Documents would establish the basis of the agreement that existed as between you and the vendor. Any other representations about the property, whether made verbally or in marketing material, generally cannot be relied upon unless they form part of the Contract. Therefore, your only recourse may be against those who were representing you on the purchase.
To consider the matter we would invite you to contact Brydens Lawyers on 1800 848 848 to speak with one of our experts.
I am a pharmacist in a small country NSW town. I had recently banned a woman with a drug problem from entry to the pharmacy. Last month, she attacked me, tore through the shop – destroying property and stock and stole medication. The police initially charged her on 7 counts but the courts dropped it to 2 and she was out on bail right away. I am in the process of putting in place an AVO against her and her partner. I have also required medical attention and time off work as a result of the injuries sustained during her attack. Can I sue her for compensation in addition to the criminal charges she is facing?
BRYDENS LAWYERS ANSWER:
Given that the injuries sustained by you occurred during the course of your employment, (and assuming that you are an employee), you are entitled to make a claim on your employer’s workers compensation insurer. The benefits to which you are entitled include weekly benefits of compensation (wages) for periods of absence as well as reimbursement of all reasonable and necessary medical treatment expenses.
In some cases, you would be also entitled to claim lump sum compensation commensurate with the degree of permanent impairment that results from the injuries. In addition to same, you would have a common law action in assault available as against the perpetrator. Of course, any compensation that you receive from the workers compensation insurer would have to be reimbursed to that insurer from any damages that you recover from the perpetrator. There is a prohibition on “double dipping”. However, what would be of more concern, is whether there would be any prospects of recovering any judgment monies from the perpetrator. That is, although the claim may be successful and you are awarded damages for the injuries which you have sustained a question then arises as to whether the perpetrator has any capacity to pay those judgment monies. One other alternative is to make a claim through the Victims Compensation Tribunal for the injuries which you have sustained. Again however it is not open to you to retain both benefits under the workers compensation scheme and compensation from the Victims Compensation Tribunal.
My wife is pregnant and our baby is due later this year. My employer is saying I am not entitled for parental leave because I muts be employed for 12 months to be eligible. I will be employed for 11 months and 16 days when our baby is due. What are my rights in this situation?
BRYDENS LAWYERS ANSWER:
Section 67 of the Fair Work Act provides than an employee is not entitled to parental leave unless the employee has, or will have, completed at least 12 months of continuous service with the employer immediately before the date that the leave is taken. Leave can be taken within 12 months after the birth of the child. If:
a) The employee has a spouse or de facto partner who is not an employee; and
b) The spouse or de facto partner has a responsibility for the care of the child for the period between the date of the birth of the child and the start date of the leave.
Therefore, you will need to continue working until you have completed 12 months of continuous service for your employer before being entitled to take parental leave.
ASK YOUR QUESTION HERE
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA TO STAY UP TO DATE WITH
WHAT IS HAPPENING AT BRYDENS LAWYERS.
LATEST NEWS FROM LEE
Following my recent post concerning medical negligence claims an enquiry was received as to whether it was also possible to sue lawyers and judges in the event that they have been negligent.
The simple answer is yes and no.
A lawyer can quite readily be sued if it is established, again ultimately to the satisfaction of the court, that the lawyer has been negligent and that as a result of that negligence, the client has suffered injury, loss or damage. The question of negligence is determined by reference
CONTACT US TODAY
LIVERPOOL HEAD OFFICE
Lvl 2, 203 Northumberland Street,
Liverpool NSW 2170
OFFICES BY APPOINTMENT ONLY
Adamstown Erina Parramatta
Albury Goulburn Redfern
Bankstown Leichhardt Sydney City
Blacktown Miranda Tamworth
Campbelltown Newcastle Wagga Wagga
Chatswood Nowra Wollongong