fbpx

QUESTIONS OF
THE WEEK

QUESTIONS OF THE WEEK

, QUESTIONS OF THE WEEK, Brydens Lawyers

Question: I Have Suffered a Loss of Hearing Due to My Line of Work – Am I Eligible to Make a Claim?

In order to make a claim for hearing loss a worker needs to establish that the loss arose from the worker’s “noisy employment”. That is, loss of hearing is not enough to establish a claim. A medical assessment is undertaken to determine that the hearing loss is in fact related to the employment.

If a worker believes that they may have suffered industrial hearing loss they should consult their doctor and request a hearing test to be undertaken. Various hearing centres will provide free hearing tests.

Once the hearing test has been conducted which demonstrates hearing loss and examination is thereafter arranged with an Ear Nose and Throat Specialist to undertake a full assessment to determine:

Additional changes worthy of noting are as follows:

  1. The level of binaural (on both sides) hearing loss.
  2. The extent to which the hearing loss is attributable to the worker’s employment.
  3. Any recommended treatment, for example, the provision of a hearing aid.

It is important in the making of a claim for hearing loss to determine the “date of injury”. Generally speaking the date on which notice of the injury is given is deemed to be the date of injury. If at the time of giving notice the worker is not employed at a noisy workplace or at all, then the date of injury is deemed to be the last day that the worker was employed in a noisy workplace. A workers compensation insurer can seek a contribution from any previous noisy employers in the five-year period preceding the claim.

Once hearing loss has been established as being referable to a noisy workplace then a claim for compensation may be available. For injuries which occurred after 1 January 2002 a claim for lump sum compensation is only available if the worker is assessed as having an 11% whole person impairment or more arising from the hearing loss. In order to achieve this threshold the worker must establish a binaural hearing loss of at least 20.5%

For injuries before 1 January 2002 the hearing loss is compensable if assessed at being at least 6% or more binaural hearing loss.

Again yet another example of “reform” undertaken by a State Government which serves only to reduce the level of compensation available to an injured worker and for the benefit of the insurance companies.

An entitlement to the provision of hearing aids is not dependent however on the level of permanent impairment resulting from the hearing loss. Hearing aids are regarded as medical aids and therefore the cost of same is recoverable from the workers compensation insurer as long as you are able to establish that the necessity for the hearing aids arises from compensable hearing loss.

If you have suffered hearing loss then you should undertake an assessment to determine the extent of that loss and whether same is related to your employment. If so, contact the experts at Brydens Lawyers today for the purpose of a free initial consultation to assess your entitlements to compensation.

Our past Questions

NEED LEGAL ADVICE? YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED

PERSONAL INJURY

 

ANONYMOUS QUESTION:
I was involved in a car accident where someone changed lanes and hit me. I was in the left lane and deemed not at fault. I have no insurance but the other at fault driver does. I contacted his insurance company and they said he needs to lodge the insurance claim himself. I contacted him and he refused to lodge a claim. What do I do in this case to ensure damage to my vehicle is compensated for by the at fault party?

BRYDENS LAWYERS ANSWER:
What you have raised is unfortunately a difficulty that is encountered quite regularly. That is, if the party at fault does not make a claim on their insurance then the claims process itself is not activated and the insurer will not respond to a claim as against its insured. It is of course open to you to try and encourage the other party to make a claim on their insurer. If they fail or refuse to do so then there would be no reason why you should not commence formal court proceedings to recover the damages to which you are entitled. Such proceedings would no doubt focus the attention of the other party who would be motivated to contact their insurer. Brydens Lawyers are available to assist and should you require legal representation please click here to contact us to speak with one of our experts.

FAMILY LAW

 

ANONYMOUS QUESTION:
My partner and I have separated and we wish to resolve our financial issues. We purchased a house and land package together although our relationship broke down soon after. We have separated now and the house is near completion. Do we need to go to court? I want to make sure I receive what I am entitled to, I am worried it is getting messy and unfair.

BRYDENS LAWYERS ANSWER:
The majority of property settlements occur outside the court system. It is indeed the preferable course. It is a much cheaper and quicker alternative to commencing proceedings in court. If the parties are able to resolve their differences and reach a resolution then the agreement can be formalised and lodged with the Family Court for appropriate orders to be made. No court attendance is required. An alternative is for the parties to enter into a binding financial agreement which does not need to be lodged with the court. There are however a number of specific legal requirements pertaining to a binding financial agreement which must be fully complied with in order to ensure that the agreement is valid.

SUPERANNUATION & TPD

 

ANONYMOUS QUESTION:
I used to work for a government agency from 1986 until November 1994. Due to a car accident on the way to work, I was injured and unable to work after this. I have been living on a disability pension ever since. Recently I have found out that I might be able to seek a lump sum payout and a pension from superannuation fund. Is this possible and can you assist with it?

BRYDENS LAWYERS ANSWER:
We assume that the insurer deemed you to be at fault in the accident and that no motor vehicle accident claim was made. It is correct that there may be rights available to you to claim lump sum benefits pursuant to your superannuation policy which would ordinarily contain provision for a total and permanent disablement claim. Given that you have been unable to work you would, ordinarily, qualify for payment of benefits in this regard. Brydens Lawyers has a specialised Superannuation and TPD Division which can assist. We would invite you to contact us to arrange an appointment with one of our expert lawyers.

COMMERCIAL LAW

 

ANONYMOUS QUESTION:
I want to understand my current obligations under my commercial lease agreement that is contingent on DA being approved. My DA is not yet approved but I have been told the council today that they are thinking of providing me with a deferred commencement date which means the DA is not operational until the conditions are met. The financial implications are too much for me to meet the condition and I would prefer not to continue with the both the DA and the lease but don’t want to lose my deposit. What are my rights?

BRYDENS LAWYERS ANSWER:
Of course, any arrangements or contract including the Commercial Lease to which you refer, can be altered, amended or terminated by agreement between the parties. It would be recommended that discussions be undertaken with the lessor to determine whether or not they would be agreeable to a Surrender of Lease and if so, on what terms. Otherwise it will be the terms of the Commercial Lease that will determine the rights and obligations of the parties. If, as you say, the Commercial Lease is contingent on a DA being approved then until such time as the DA is approved the Commercial Lease is not in force or has effect. Brydens Lawyers has a specialised commercial division which is available to assist. We would invite you to contact Brydens Lawyers to speak with one of our experts should you wish to engage expert legal advice and representation.

PROPERTY LAW

 

ANONYMOUS QUESTION:
We bought an investment property in QLD through a financial group in Sydney. They misrepresented the property, providing us with paperwork that states it was a brand new build. Upon settlement we found out that the property was in fact 5 years old. We want to claim compensation for loss of depreciation, extra strata costs, misrepresentation and mental anguish. Are we within our rights to do this?

BRYDENS LAWYERS ANSWER:
When buying any property the guiding principle for purchases is “buyer beware”. That is, as the purchaser you bear the onus of investigating and establishing exactly what it is that is being bought before Contracts are exchanged.
That being the case consideration may have to be given as to whether there is an available cause of action as against your solicitor or licensed conveyancer who acted on your behalf in whom was entrusted the obligation to ensure that what was being purchased was that which was being represented to you. Your legal representatives have an obligation to ensure that the contract and all the details of the property that are being purchased are explained to you fully and that you understand same.
Before advising further it would be necessary for us to undertake a complete review of your conveyancing file. The Contract and Disclosure Documents would establish the basis of the agreement that existed as between you and the vendor. Any other representations about the property, whether made verbally or in marketing material, generally cannot be relied upon unless they form part of the Contract. Therefore, your only recourse may be against those who were representing you on the purchase.
To consider the matter we would invite you to contact Brydens Lawyers on 1800 848 848 to speak with one of our experts.

WORKERS COMPENSATION

 

ANONYMOUS QUESTION:
I am a pharmacist in a small country NSW town. I had recently banned a woman with a drug problem from entry to the pharmacy. Last month, she attacked me, tore through the shop – destroying property and stock and stole medication. The police initially charged her on 7 counts but the courts dropped it to 2 and she was out on bail right away. I am in the process of putting in place an AVO against her and her partner. I have also required medical attention and time off work as a result of the injuries sustained during her attack. Can I sue her for compensation in addition to the criminal charges she is facing?

BRYDENS LAWYERS ANSWER:
Given that the injuries sustained by you occurred during the course of your employment, (and assuming that you are an employee), you are entitled to make a claim on your employer’s workers compensation insurer. The benefits to which you are entitled include weekly benefits of compensation (wages) for periods of absence as well as reimbursement of all reasonable and necessary medical treatment expenses.
In some cases, you would be also entitled to claim lump sum compensation commensurate with the degree of permanent impairment that results from the injuries. In addition to same, you would have a common law action in assault available as against the perpetrator. Of course, any compensation that you receive from the workers compensation insurer would have to be reimbursed to that insurer from any damages that you recover from the perpetrator. There is a prohibition on “double dipping”. However, what would be of more concern, is whether there would be any prospects of recovering any judgment monies from the perpetrator. That is, although the claim may be successful and you are awarded damages for the injuries which you have sustained a question then arises as to whether the perpetrator has any capacity to pay those judgment monies. One other alternative is to make a claim through the Victims Compensation Tribunal for the injuries which you have sustained. Again however it is not open to you to retain both benefits under the workers compensation scheme and compensation from the Victims Compensation Tribunal.

EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES

 

ANONYMOUS QUESTION:
My wife is pregnant and our baby is due later this year. My employer is saying I am not entitled for parental leave because I muts be employed for 12 months to be eligible. I will be employed for 11 months and 16 days when our baby is due. What are my rights in this situation?

BRYDENS LAWYERS ANSWER:
Section 67 of the Fair Work Act provides than an employee is not entitled to parental leave unless the employee has, or will have, completed at least 12 months of continuous service with the employer immediately before the date that the leave is taken. Leave can be taken within 12 months after the birth of the child. If:
a) The employee has a spouse or de facto partner who is not an employee; and
b) The spouse or de facto partner has a responsibility for the care of the child for the period between the date of the birth of the child and the start date of the leave.
Therefore, you will need to continue working until you have completed 12 months of continuous service for your employer before being entitled to take parental leave.

ASK YOUR QUESTION HERE

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA TO STAY UP TO DATE WITH
WHAT IS HAPPENING AT BRYDENS LAWYERS.

, QUESTIONS OF THE WEEK, Brydens Lawyers
, QUESTIONS OF THE WEEK, Brydens Lawyers
, QUESTIONS OF THE WEEK, Brydens Lawyers
, QUESTIONS OF THE WEEK, Brydens Lawyers

KEEP UP TO DATE WITH NEWS & EVENTS


Newsletter Subscription

Form Description

LATEST NEWS FROM LEE


An article published by insurancenews.com.au on 22 November 2019 references a reported $876 million net loss by NSW State owned Icare for its workers compensation Nominal Insurer scheme last financial year amid rising medical costs and falling bond yields.

It is reported that gross premiums were in the order of $2.5 billion while net claims expenses/scheme costs were just over $4 billion. That is, there was a reported underwriting loss of almost $2.4 billion while Icare received a net investment revenue of just over $1.6 billion.

CONTACT US ONLINE


NEW_CONTACT US ABOUT YOUR CASE

 

CONTACT US TODAY


LIVERPOOL HEAD OFFICE

Lvl 2, 203 Northumberland Street,
Liverpool NSW 2170

OFFICES BY APPOINTMENT ONLY


 

Adamstown            Erina                 Parramatta
Albury                     Goulburn          Redfern
Bankstown             Leichhardt        Sydney City
Blacktown              Miranda            Tamworth
Campbelltown       Newcastle         Wagga Wagga
Chatswood             Nowra               Wollongong
Dubbo                     Orange

 

 

Trading Hours